So the
question to ask is - is it really that there are more deaths of babies in a hot
car as a result of the parents momentary "memory failure" or is it
just that it has been more reported now while this destructive pattern had
always remained the same? The answer to this question is unknown as there is no
effective track record of these instances for some unexplained reason.
The Heatstroke
Deaths of Children in Vehicles by the Department of Geosciences, San Francisco
state university collected the media REPORTED heatstroke deaths and they have
found:
Obviously,
there is no way to cross reference this information and to be able to come to a
conclusion whether or not this pattern is stable or not or whether the reported
news are influenced by market hidden (corporational) forces - there is no way
to tell as there is no governmental guideline that track this phenomena within
the starting point of prevention is the best cure; but there is something very
interesting that I have found when I asked what happened in 2010 where the
reported heatstroke deaths were rapidly reported and the answer was found
within the following article:
"Another reason
for child fatalities inside vehicles may have something to do with laws that
put children in the back seat to avoid airbags.
Numbers out of the
U.S. show that heat stroke deaths for children left in cars have been
dramatically on the rise since laws forced children to sit in the backseat to
avoid high-powered airbags.
“As soon as that
happened we saw these heat stroke deaths of children being forgotten in the car
reach an all-time high, I mean they just blew up. It went from a couple a year
to maybe 30 or 40 a year,” Rollins said.
“It has far
surpassed the number of children being killed by airbags,” she added.
In 1997 there were
29 airbag related deaths in the U.S., and 11 children died in vehicles from
heat stroke. In 2010 airbag deaths have all but been eliminated, but 49
children died inside cars from heat stroke"
Thus
here is a fatal example of acts that are done within the Name of Prevention yet
without proper tools to be able to make a fundamental assessment as to what
would be the consequences of pacing the baby in the back sit of a car, the
result achieve are far worse than what was intendant to be prevented. The
reason is that the relationship between memory, physical body, and
environmental influences were not taken into consideration, a proper research
was not done and as a result the number of death doubled itself and till this
day, the law was not adjusted/aligned. The real question is why wasn't the law
adjusted? Who benefits from having enforced acts that are clearly do not
support Life?
With the
airbag and forcing the babies to sit on the back of the car scenario, the
problem was the increase amount of car accidents people were (and still are)
participating with and not as much the placement of a baby in the front or the
back of the car. That is just an outflow of a problem we have accepted to be
valid which is car accidents. Here, instead of understanding the core/source of
the problem, which is the increasing car accidents all over the world and its
relationship to the mind, the physical body and environmental influences (both
individually and collectively), the solutions were diverted to a quick fix
solution that would only benefit the corporation but in no way corrects and
prevent car accident from reoccurring and life to be taken so lightly.
The same
point exists within the scenario of heatstroke deaths caused by what the
experts defined as "memory failure" of the parent wherein the
solutions that are provided to "prevent" these problems are mostly in
the benefit of the corporations who took a marketing advantage to promote their
products
(as
was explained in the previous blog) as a solution for parents to not forget
their children in the cars and yet, an absolute solution that would eliminate
the problem, has not yet to been presented or even thoroughly investigated and
accordingly the resources were diverted to places where profit can be made
instead of to sources that would provide the support and guidance required to
make sure that nothing and no one would ever be compromised due to
dysfunctional memory system that leads to fatal consequences. Quite to the
contrary - the justification to not move to a best for all solution is that
there is not so many deaths to justify educational campaign where parents can
be supported in taking responsibility over their automated memory structure and
to instead become aware of their physical surrounding.
One thing
is certain, we are existing in a consumerized vampires world where we would not
miss a chance to make money out of a problem by diverting the resources, the
time, the labour and the means to a solution that if anything, only worsening
the problem instead of identify the source of the problem and preventing it
from occurring within an ultimate solution that can in fact be trusted.
So, if
you really serious about finding solutions that can practically work within
this physical reality, I suggest to start investigating 3 points -
