Feb 23, 2013 | By: A Woman

How Capitalism Justifies Child Labour - Part 2 - Day 309

thirsty - Niklas NydahlThis is continuation to my Previous blog - How Capitalism Justifies Child Labour - Day 308.
Here is another example of how the Capitalistic System has abdicate its responsibility with regards to Child Labour and within that, deliberately not seeing, realizing and understanding the direct relationship between Capitalism and Child Labour and how thus furthermore, the Capitalistic System as the Consumerism system IS the system that perpetuate Child Labour in this world while all alone, using g massive Psychology technics to manipulate and divert the human consciousness to never see one's responsible and thus, maintain the Status Quo of Abuse and Suffering in this world.
 
Here is a Question and Answer taken from the website Capitalism.org:
 
Throughout history the parents of most families could not produce enough to support their families without having their children work also. It was the accumulation of capital by the industrialists that increased the productivity of adults, so that children did not have to work in fields or factories. In poor non-capitalist countries they are still working in fields and factories, because the parents are not productive enough to support their children.
Historically, children working in factories (and fields) was only a transitory stage between early feudalism and capitalism. Prior to working in factories, before the Industrial Revolution, many children (and their parents) used to die and starve, as evidenced by the high infant mortality statistics before the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. Observe that is was not until families left the “country” and went into the “cities” that they were able to produce enough food to eat. The clearest evidence of this is population and infant mortality statistics: population did not go up and infant mortality did not go down until the Industrial Revolution.
If life was so great before capitalism in the “country”, why was infant mortality so high and population numbers considerably lower before capitalism? Answer: because life was not so great until the Industrial Revolution made its appearance.
 
 
Let's have a look at the first statement:
 
Throughout history the parents of most families could not produce enough to support their families without having their children work also. It was the accumulation of capital by the industrialists that increased the productivity of adults, so that children did not have to work in fields or factories. In poor non-capitalist countries they are still working in fields and factories, because the parents are not productive enough to support their children.
 
Yes, in Poor Non-Capitalist countries, the children works or shell we call it by its name - are Salved and Forced to work in the fields to support themselves and their Families. Now, why is that?
If one watch the Documentary - 'The Power Principle' one would see, realize and understand the US Agenda in keeping these Non-Capitalistic countries in it's current state of Government. Within that context and for the Full picture of what is really going on, I suggest reading the book: Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.
 
The Capitalistic System is the Force that made sure that these kids will forevermore remain slaves and will have no real change to fulfil their upmost potential. Instead of having a system that Equally support all whom involved in the production of a product, the system preserving the Status Quo within a blink of an eye.
These kids are forced to a life of Modern Slavery because we want to pursue our Rewards, that which makes us feel good, our happiness without giving any care and consideration for all who are involved in our perceived happiness. All we care about is to maximized our profits even if that means that others needs to be abused on the way. We are so good in denial that we can't even see what we are accepting and allowing due to extensive brainwashed done deliberately to make us Organic Robots. For that, I suggest watching the 'Century of the Self'.
 
Here is a Real Solution to End Child Labour and those who are able to implement such a solution are those who currently exists within Capitalistic Countries as we have the access and means to do just that:
 
WHAT IS PROFIT-SHARE?
Currently profit is the money a company makes after they have covered their costs, including paying out wages. In an EMC - profit comprises of all the added value that is placed on resources - which is your labour. Therefore - within the price, the percentage share must be included of each one that was part of the creation of the product in such a way that each one ends up with an equal share of the company's profits, so - there will be no need for wages - as the profit becomes your wage.
 
EQUALIZING WAGES – COOPERATION AMONG CORPORATIONS
If a company at any time makes more money than they need to provide each one with their equal share of the profit as well as covering their costs - those monies will go into a fund that is responsible for assisting companies that are not making sufficient to cover their costs and provide each one with their fair share. That way a balancing effect takes place so that all companies are not only cooperatives in how they cooperate internally - but all cooperate with each other as well…." (Day 163: Equal Money Capitalism - Redefining Profit)
 
Let's have  a look at the second statement:
 
 
Historically, children working in factories (and fields) was only a transitory stage between early feudalism and capitalism. Prior to working in factories, before the Industrial Revolution, many children (and their parents) used to die and starve, as evidenced by the high infant mortality statistics before the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. Observe that is was not until families left the “country” and went into the “cities” that they were able to produce enough food to eat. The clearest evidence of this is population and infant mortality statistics: population did not go up and infant mortality did not go down until the Industrial Revolution.
 
Here is another justification for why we should continue with the abusive Capitalistic System and defend it by stating that at the moment, the infant mortality rate is much less than before. Now, the truth is that infant mortality rate wasn't reduced due the Capitalistic System but due to the advancement of Medicine and technology. The Real question is - Why these advancement are not implemented world wide? Why not Equally share what we have so that others would have?
 
Also, I'm not sure that statistic is even accurate and measurable because it is isolated from the entire world and only measure the before and after of the Capitalistic countries without investigating the Consequences that lead to Infant Mortality as an outflow of the Capitalistic system. 
 
Again, what is not yet seen, realize and understood is that anything can by justified to keep the Status Quo in tact. The Question is - will we accept and allow these justification or we stand up and make sure that all have access to what the world have to offer? Why can't we not exists within the Principle of Give as You would Like to Receive in its absolute application?
 
 
If life was so great before capitalism in the “country”, why was infant mortality so high and population numbers considerably lower before capitalism? Answer: because life was not so great until the Industrial Revolution made its appearance.
208152_176952575688792_175698322480884_476265_6255274_nHere again, a statement that should activate a form of acceptance within and as you. yes, your life is much better now because you have slaves to make it so without even being aware of the existent of such slaves. It's brilliant actually. Life wasn't great before the industrial Revolution and it's not great now. We would expect that Capital would be utilized to make life great but instead, it only perpetuated the gaps and cause severe Poverty, abuse and Suffering in this world. Life isn't great for the Majority of this world but Life can be great if we create a world that is literally best for all where happiness can be really expressed and lived without the harm and abuse of any life form. Understand one thing, as long as unnecessary suffering exists in this world, one can not protest for one's own happiness because if one does so, one is in complete separation from that which is here with no real values towards Life and all that Life is consisting of and existing as. If one is able to be happy without making sure that all have the ability to be happy in this world, what does that imply?
 
Let's stop all justifications for the Problems in this world but instead, take our responsibility as life to Correct the problems and establish a system that protect, respect and honour all life forms.
Investigate Equal Money.
 
 
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

0 comments:

Post a Comment